Dear Gary:Please read these threads regarding D-VHS: http://www.softronix.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000938.html and http://www.hometheaterforum .com/htforum/showthread.php?s=&threadid= 57582&perpage=30&display=&pagenumber=1I echo your sentiments regarding D-Theater. My fear is that if D-VHS doesn’t become reasonably successful, we will get MPEG-4 red laser shoved down our throats by DVD Forum members. I wholeheartedly disagree with 7 Mbps MPEG-4 to provide 1080i or any other poor attempt to provide HD DVD. Anything short of FMD technology or some sort of Blu-ray technology for HD DVD will provide nothing more than questionably better quality we already have with the current DVD format.I hope that fellow home theatre enthusiasts embrace the humongous increase in video and picture quality that D-VHS brings to the table today.I will not settle for any attempt by the DVD Forum to call over-compressed, 7 Mpbs 1080i video an HD DVD format. If the DVD Forum can bring to the table something close to what D-VHS brings to the table, that is a different story.I FULLY and WHOLEHEARTEDLY embrace D-VHS and look forward to buying as many prerecorded movies as possible in the D-VHS format.
Christian Artman, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Editor-In-Chief Gary Reber Comments:
We address the DVD Forum proposal in this issue. While those who have seen demonstrations of MPEG-4 HD DVD say it is a wonderful picture, it assuredly does not equal the picture quality of the D-VHS D-Theater platform. I am an advocate for HD DVD that demonstrates a quantum leap in picture performance. Let’s get it right.
You can E-mail Widescreen Review @ mailto:editorgary@widescreenreview.com